Clean Water Action

Login | Register
Explore Your Community | Discover the Issues
  • Issues
    • Clean Water's Mission
    • Protecting America's Waters
    • Global Warming and a New Energy Economy
    • Healthy, Safer Families and Communities
    • Making Democracy Work
  • Communities
    • California
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • DC
    • Delaware
    • Florida
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Minnesota
    • New Hampshire
    • New Jersey
    • Pennsylvania
    • Rhode Island
    • South Dakota
    • Texas
    • Virginia
    • National
  • About Us
    • Finances & Effectiveness
    • Offices
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Board & Officers
    • Privacy Policy
    • Site Credits
    • Contact Us
  • Canvass
    • Apply for a canvass job
    • Why join a canvass?
  • Jobs
  • Media Center
    • Media Contacts
    • Media Kits
    • Position Statements
  • Publications
    • Reports, Summaries
    • Factsheets
    • Research Materials
    • Other Resources
  • Supporter Center
    • Volunteer
    • Subscription Maintenance
    • Jobs & Internships
    • We All Live Downstream
    • Privacy Policy
  • Take Action
    • Volunteer
  • Join or Give
    • Ways to Give
    • Why Your Support Matters
    • About Your Membership
    • Mission
    • Finances & Effectiveness
    • Privacy Policy
South Dakota

Communities

  • News
  • Overview
  • Features
  • Online Actions
  • Publications
  • Press Releases
  • Campaign Strategies
    • Promoting Wind Power
    • Stopping Big Stone II
  • Media Kits
  • Staff Profiles
  • Events
  • Volunteer Network

Donate Now

Join or give a gift or find other ways to give to Clean Water Action

Connect

Connect to us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterCheck out our YouTube channel
Shop through We-Care to advance Clean Water Action's mission and strategy for protecting America's clean and safe water now, and for the future

Explore Your Community

Clean Water Action's national campaigns work on Federal laws and policy. State offices campaign on the same issues locally. Get more information about our work in each state and around the country.

Discover the Issues

Publications

Printer-friendly version
10 Most Recent Publications for SD

EPA Sends Big Stone II Coal Plant Back To Drawing Board

Less than three days after the Bush Administration left office, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has overturned the State of South Dakota's approval of the massive BigStone II coal-fired power plant. The EPA's decision comes after the state failed to require state-of-the-art pollution controls for the coal plant that would address concerns about harmful soot, smog and global warming pollution.

PDF iconEPA decision on Big Stone II, part 1 (pdf, 2.12 MB)

Tags:
  • Minnesota
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • global warming
  • Report Summary
  • water
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Read more

Big Stone II: Rising Risk, Lowered Water

Overview

  • Background
  • Key Issues
  • MERCURY
  • CO2 / GLOBAL WARMING
  • WATER
  • Current Status
  • Questions

by Mary Jo Stueve, South Dakota Program Coordinator

PDF iconGet the full presentation (pdf, 556 Kb)

Tags:
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • global warming
  • Other Resource
  • water
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Read more

Big Stone II Makes Massive Water Demands

Plans for the proposed Big Stone II coal plant near Milbank, South Dakota call for using massive amounts of water. In addition to the 3.2 billion gallon surface draw approved last year, co-owners have now filed for another 3.2 billion gallons from groundwater. With concerns about pollution growing and spiraling costs for the proposed coal plant, excessive water demands add another reason to say no to Big Stone II. This huge demand for water could be disastrous for the local area and farmers - as well as Big Stone Lake. For many years, water discharge has exceeded recharge, and experts say that previous underground water levels are not likely to return because of increased demand on a limited resource.

Tags:
  • Minnesota
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • Factsheet
  • global warming
  • water
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Read more

IGCC: Asking the Hard Questions: Can Coal Ever Be "Clean"?

Presentation Overview

Big Stone II Coal Case Study

  • Players & Action Arenas
  • Key Issues
  • Power-Ploys & Counter-Ploys
  • Media Matters
  • Lessons Learned

by Mary Jo Stueve, South Dakota Program Coordinator

PDF iconGet the complete presentation (pdf, 712 Kb)

Tags:
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • global warming
  • Other Resource
  • water
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Read more

No To Coal At Big Stone, Yes To Clean Renewables

Problem

Otter Tail Power Company, in conjunction with several other power companies, is proposing a major new source of air and water pollution for South Dakota and Minnesota. Otter Tail plans to more than double the output of the existing coalburning power plant at Big Stone by building a new $1.6 billion plant on the same site . Big Stone II. Coal pollution is a threat to our health and environment. Investing in a costly new coal-burning power plant wastes money and takes South Dakota away from safe, clean renewable energy from wind.

Toxic Coal Pollution

Tags:
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • Factsheet
  • global warming
  • water
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Read more

U.S. EPA Toxics Release Inventory Envirofacts Report: Ottertail Powerplant

PDF iconGet the full report (pdf, 133 Kb)

Get Adobe Reader badge You will need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader properly installed to view PDF documents. You can get it free from Adobe.

Tags:
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • global warming
  • Research Material
  • water
  • Login or register to post comments

Big Stone II: A Big Mistake

Problems with Big Stone II

  • It's destructive: Big Stone II and global warming
  • It's expensive: impact of emerging global warming laws on costs of Big Stone II
  • It's not needed: wind-based alternatives can meet energy needs better
  • It's a lost opportunity: wind power brings far more permanent economic benefits to the region

by Barbara Freese, Union of Concerned Scientists presented at SoDak Park Supper Club on the South Dakota shores of Big Stone Lake at the September 28th, 2006 Public Education Forum.

Tags:
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • global warming
  • Other Resource
  • water
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Read more

Overview of the South Dakota Generation and Transmission Facilities

by Greg Rislov, Commission Advisor to the SD Public Utilities Commission, SDEIA Board Educational Meeting June 9, 2006 presentation.

PDF iconGet the complete presentation (pdf, 1.1MB)

Tags:
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • global warming
  • Other Resource
  • water
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Read more

Mercury and Coal Plants: An Overview

What are the sources of mercury pollution in the region?

  1. Energy: coal-burning power plants
  2. Taconite processing (MN only)
  3. Purposeful use:
    • Municipal solid waste combustion
    • Volatilization of disposed products
    • Smelters that recycle cars, appliances

Mercury pollution from coal plants

Coal plants are the largest source of mercury pollution in Minnesota and South Dakota.

Tags:
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • environmental health
  • global warming
  • Other Resource
  • toxics
  • water
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Read more
see more


Other Publications

New Jersey Brochures, Fact Sheets, Power Points, and Resolutions

Tags:
  • New Jersey
  • energy
  • environmental health
  • Factsheet
  • global warming
  • toxics
  • water
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Read more

Everglades for All

Cover image: Everglades for Al, 2010In March 2010, Clean Water Fund released Everglades for All.

Over 1,500 Florida residents participated in our survey which was intended to get a pulse on how the public and diverse constituency groups feel about ongoing outreach and historic Everglades restoration efforts.

This survey revealed new opportunities for relationship building and will hopefully increase public input on key decisions in Everglades restoration.

Abstract: 

Over 1,500 Florida residents participated in our survey which was intended to get a pulse on how the public and diverse constituency groups feel about ongoing outreach and historic Everglades restoration efforts.

Tags:
  • Florida
  • democracy
  • environmental health
  • Other Resource
  • water
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Read more

Turning Up the Heat: Exposing the manufacturers' lackluster mercury thermostat collection program

Abstract: 

Turning Up the Heat exposes the dismal results of the manufacturers’
voluntary mercury thermostat collection program. The Thermostat
Recycling Corporation (TRC) has collected less than 5% of the
approximately 100 tons of mercury from mercury thermostats
removed from service in the last decade. The collection program in
Rhode Island is below the national average for preventing mercury
pollution from thermostats and far behind the national leaders. The
report recommends that states adopt strong laws, with financial
incentives and performance standards for recycling mercury thermostats,
to drastically improve the TRC program and prevent mercury pollution.

Tags:
  • Rhode Island
  • Documents
  • toxics
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Read more

Environmental Groups Ask That Climate Bill Include Energy Efficiency

Take action now for a clean energy future for America!

October 30, 2009

The Honorable Barbara Boxer, Chair
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
410 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

RE: Require Efficiency Investment of at least 1/3 of Allowance Value Given to Electric Utilities

Dear Chairwoman Boxer:

Related Articles
  • A clean energy future for America!
Tags:
  • National
  • energy
  • global warming
  • Other Resource
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Read more

Safer Technology: The Only Solution When Security Fails

Eight years after September 11th, sobering warnings remain unheeded regarding the vulnerability of U.S. chemical plants to terrorist attacks. Journalists across the country have repeatedly made their way into more than 80 chemical plants demonstrating the ease with which fence-line security can be penetrated. As President Obama said in 2006, "these plants are stationary weapons of mass destruction spread all across the country."

The potential for fatalities and economic disruption from an attack on one of these plants is staggering. A 2001 U.S. Army Surgeon General study estimated that in densely populated areas 900,000 to 2.4 million people could be killed or injured in a terrorist attack on a U.S. chemical plant in a densely populated area.

Related Articles
  • Help Protect Communities by Urging a Switch to Safer Chemical Technologies
Tags:
  • National
  • environmental health
  • Factsheet
  • toxics
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Read more
Issues | Communities | About Us | Canvass | Jobs | Media Center | Publications | Supporter Center | Take Action | Join or Give