Clean Water Action

Login | Register
Explore Your Community | Discover the Issues
  • Issues
    • Clean Water's Mission
    • Protecting America's Waters
    • Global Warming and a New Energy Economy
    • Healthy, Safer Families and Communities
    • Making Democracy Work
  • Communities
    • California
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • DC
    • Delaware
    • Florida
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Minnesota
    • New Hampshire
    • New Jersey
    • Pennsylvania
    • Rhode Island
    • South Dakota
    • Texas
    • Virginia
    • National
  • About Us
    • Finances & Effectiveness
    • Offices
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Board & Officers
    • Privacy Policy
    • Site Credits
    • Contact Us
  • Canvass
    • Apply for a canvass job
    • Why join a canvass?
  • Jobs
  • Media Center
    • Media Contacts
    • Media Kits
    • Position Statements
  • Publications
    • Reports, Summaries
    • Factsheets
    • Research Materials
    • Other Resources
  • Supporter Center
    • Volunteer
    • Subscription Maintenance
    • Jobs & Internships
    • We All Live Downstream
    • Privacy Policy
  • Take Action
    • Volunteer
  • Join or Give
    • Ways to Give
    • Why Your Support Matters
    • About Your Membership
    • Mission
    • Finances & Effectiveness
    • Privacy Policy
South Dakota

Communities

  • News
  • Overview
  • Features
  • Online Actions
  • Publications
  • Press Releases
  • Campaign Strategies
    • Promoting Wind Power
    • Stopping Big Stone II
  • Media Kits
  • Staff Profiles
  • Events
  • Volunteer Network

Donate Now

Join or give a gift or find other ways to give to Clean Water Action

Connect

Connect to us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterCheck out our YouTube channel
Shop through We-Care to advance Clean Water Action's mission and strategy for protecting America's clean and safe water now, and for the future

Explore Your Community

Clean Water Action's national campaigns work on Federal laws and policy. State offices campaign on the same issues locally. Get more information about our work in each state and around the country.

Discover the Issues

Printer-friendly version

Big Stone II Sent Back to the Drawing Board

Big Stone II siteThe Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has overturned the State of South Dakota's approval of the massive Big Stone II coal-fired power plant. The EPA's decision comes after the state failed to require state-of-the-art pollution controls for the coal plant that would address concerns about harmful soot, smog and global warming pollution.

This decision likely spells the end of Otter Tail Power's Big Stone II coal plant. At a minimum, Otter Tail Power will have to go back to the drawing board and redesign the project to incorporate the best and maximum available control technology for pollution like soot and smog. Sierra Club and Clean Water Action will be pushing for EPA to set limits also for carbon dioxide, the main contributor to global warming.

Related Articles
  • Obama EPA Sends Coal Plant Back To Drawing Board
  • EPA Sends Big Stone II Coal Plant Back To Drawing Board
Tags:
  • Minnesota
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • global warming
  • water
  • Read more

Minnesota PUC Snubs Locals, Clean Energy Advocates with New Coal Plant Approval

The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) unanimously approved a transmission line needed for new Big Stone II coal-burning power plant just across Minnesota's western border in Milbank, S.D. The new coal plant would use millions of gallons of water from the Minnesota River watershed.

Despite reams of testimony about the harm to air and water from the plant and the risky investment in coal burning at a time when coal prices and carbon emission fines are poised to increase, the PUC ruled that the plant could go ahead. The new plant will be the equivalent in Global Warming pollution of adding over half a million new cars to the road.

"This is a tremendous disappointment from the PUC, a milquetoast decision that means that if Big Stone II gets built, shareholders and ratepayers will have to bear the extraordinary costs of coal and carbon that Otter Tail Power did not account for, not to mention the pollution," said Darrell Gerber with Clean Water Action. "It just doesn't make sense."

Related Articles
  • Building the New Energy Economy
  • The Year in Clean Water: 2009
  • Obama’s EPA Raises Objections to South Dakota Coal Power Plant
  • Big Stone II Sent Back to the Drawing Board
  • EPA Sends Big Stone II Coal Plant Back To Drawing Board
Tags:
  • Minnesota
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • global warming
  • Read more

Big Stone II 'Deals' - Who Wins? Who Loses? Who will safeguard the public interest?

By Mary Jo Stueve

Also published in the Argus Leader, "Should water to burn coal trump everything else?"

Last year, South Dakota bragged of a 'deal' with the utilities proposing the 630MW coal fired Big Stone II, citing environmental benefits and room for wind. The South Dakota Public Utilities Commission (SD PUC) applauded that the utilities could commit to just 189 lbs of mercury emissions per year.

On Friday August 31, Otter Tail Power on behalf of Big Stone II struck a deal with the Minnesota Department of Commerce (MN DOC) indicating it would limit mercury emissions up to 90%.

Tags:
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • global warming
  • water
  • Read more

New Breed in South Dakota--Water Hogs

July 2008: Dallas-based Hyperion Energy plans to build one of South Dakota's new 'water hogs' - an oil-refinery and coal plant right in the heart of prime, fertile agricultural land in southeast South Dakota. CNN Special Investigations Unit reports how this project has pitted neighbor against neighbor with some farmers vowing legal fight. Save Union County questions whether Hyperion has the credibility and financing necessary to follow through.

Tags:
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • global warming
  • water
  • Read more

Stopping Coal in Its Tracks

Loosely affiliated activists draw a hard line -- and hold it

by Ted Nace; illustrations by Linda Zacks

Published in the January/February 2008 issue of Orion

Tags:
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • global warming
  • Read more

Ottertail Petition

In the Matter of the Application of Otter Tail Power Company and Others for Certification of Transmission Facilities in Western Minnesota; MPUC Docket No. CN-05-619; OAH 12-2500-17037-2;

January 15, 2008

Subject: Additional public hearing requested, BSII CON

Dear Judge Mihalchick and Judge Neilson,

Tags:
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • global warming
  • water
  • Read more

Reconvene the Minnesota-South Dakota Boundary Waters Commission

Clean Water Action joins the Minnesota River Board in urging Governor Pawlenty and Rounds to reconvene the Boundary Waters Commission for Big Stone Lake.("Board: Minn. should have a say in water appropriation for Big Stone II," 29 January 2008, West Central Tribune).

Related Articles
  • Protect our water at Big Stone Lake
Tags:
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • global warming
  • water
  • Read more

Big Stone II Background Information

pdf iconBig Stone II makes massive water demands: Plans for the proposed Big Stone II coal plant near Milbank, South Dakota call for using massive amounts of water. In addition to the 3.2 billion gallon surface draw approved last year, co-owners have now filed for another 3.2 billion gallons from groundwater. With concerns about pollution growing and spiraling costs for the proposed coal plant,

Tags:
  • South Dakota
  • energy
  • global warming
  • water
  • Read more
Issues | Communities | About Us | Canvass | Jobs | Media Center | Publications | Supporter Center | Take Action | Join or Give