Clean Water Action

Login | Register
Explore Your Community | Discover the Issues
  • Issues
    • Protecting America's Water
    • Combating Climate Change
    • Toxic Chemicals
    • Making Democracy Work
    • Clean Up Coal Ash
    • Fracking
  • States
    • California
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • DC
    • Delaware
    • Florida
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Minnesota
    • New Hampshire
    • New Jersey
    • Pennsylvania
    • Rhode Island
    • Texas
    • Virginia
    • National
  • About Us
    • Clean Water's Mission
    • Finances & Effectiveness
    • Offices
    • Board & Officers
    • Clean Water People
    • Senior Staff
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
  • Canvass
  • Jobs
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Apply for a canvass job
  • Media Center
    • Press Releases
    • Clean Water Videos
    • Media Contacts
  • Publications
    • Congressional Scorecard
    • Newsletters
    • Clean Water Videos
    • Reports, Summaries
    • Factsheets
  • Supporter Center
    • 2013 National Member Poll
    • Privacy Policy
  • Take Action
    • National Actions
    • Actions by State
    • Join the Clean Water Movement
  • Join or Give
    • Donate Now
    • Make a Monthly Gift
    • Make a Leadership Gift
    • Ways to Give
    • Why Your Support Matters
    • About Your Membership
    • Get the CleanWater Card
  • Blog
    • Subscribe
 

Connect

Donate to Clean Water! Get the Clean Water Emails!Find us on Facebook!Follow us on Twitter Watch our Videos on YouTube! We All Live Downstream

Search

N.J. tells nuclear plant to build cooling tower

New Jersey regulators have recommended a new cooling-water tower at one of the nation's oldest nuclear plants, in a ruling widely expected to increase pressure for towers at the Salem nuclear plants on the Delaware River.

Energy giant Exelon immediately warned that it will "have no alternative" but to close the plant at Oyster Creek in Ocean County. Plant officials have warned that a new cooling system would cost hundreds of millions of dollars, with construction disrupting operations for years.

The issue, slated for public hearings on Feb. 24, will be decided by incoming Republican Gov. Chris Christie's new administration, with action on permits for intakes at PSEG Nuclear's Salem Units 1 and 2 expected to accelerate afterward.

Environmental and conservation groups have long argued that Oyster Creek and PSEG's Salem reactors all should use water recycling systems that cool hot water in huge spray towers, reducing the use of fresh water from rivers.

All now have designs that draw massive amounts of water from adjacent waterways for one trip through the plants. Critics say the practice needlessly sucks billions of fish and other aquatic organisms into deadly pipework and screens, in some cases threatening entire fisheries.

Christie, who takes office next Tuesday, said during his campaign that he would move quickly to reduce fish kills from Oyster Creek's cooling system, which takes 662 million gallons of water daily from Forked River off Barnegat Bay.

"It's a little late in coming," said Jane Nogaki, a member of the New Jersey Environmental Federation. "But we're very happy nevertheless that our concerns and fears for Oyster Creek have been proven justified, and that DEP agrees this technology should be used."

Published Date: 
01/12/2010
News Source: 
Courier Post
Tweet
  • Printer-friendly version
Tags:
  • New Jersey
  • energy
  • water
Issues | States | About Us | Canvass | Jobs | Media Center | Publications | Supporter Center | Take Action | Join or Give | Search